nVent vs Vertiv

nVent and Vertiv are both placed on 7 of the same AI data center parts in this catalog, spanning layers 4, 5. nVent appears on 9 parts in total and Vertiv on 22.

At a glance

nVentVertiv
Ownershippublicpublic
HeadquartersLondon, United KingdomWesterville, United States
Primary listingNVTVRT
Market cap20.3B USD74.8B USD
Parts placed922
Layers covered36
Units / subsidiaries00
Seen in machines12

Market caps are a nightly snapshot in each listing's own currency, never converted.

What the shared parts are

The 7 parts both make

PartnVentVertiv
Enclosures
Layer 4 — Servers, racks & integration
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred
Rack PDUs
Layer 4 — Servers, racks & integration
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred
Rack manifolds
Layer 5 — Liquid cooling (IT-side: chip to CDU)
manufacturer disclosedmanufacturer inferred
Coolant distribution units
Layer 5 — Liquid cooling (IT-side: chip to CDU)
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred
Rear-door heat exchangers
Layer 5 — Liquid cooling (IT-side: chip to CDU)
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred
Leak detection, flow & pressure sensing
Layer 5 — Liquid cooling (IT-side: chip to CDU)
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred
Rack/row cooling controls & software
Layer 5 — Liquid cooling (IT-side: chip to CDU)
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred

Only nVent

Only Vertiv

Named in the same machines

Questions

Do nVent and Vertiv compete?
In this catalog they are both placed on 7 of the same parts, across 2 layers: Enclosures, Rack PDUs, Rack manifolds, Coolant distribution units and 3 more. Sharing a part does not mean selling the same product to the same buyer, so read each row's product note.
Which has more placements, nVent or Vertiv?
nVent has 9 placements and Vertiv has 22. Placement counts reflect how thoroughly each company has been catalogued as well as its real breadth, so they are not a ranking.

Generated from the catalog's part-to-company table. Each placement is tagged disclosed, reported or inferred; see sources & method. Neither company is endorsed or ranked here.