Legrand vs Vertiv

Legrand and Vertiv are both placed on 6 of the same AI data center parts in this catalog, spanning layers 4, 5, 7. Legrand appears on 8 parts in total and Vertiv on 22.

At a glance

LegrandVertiv
Ownershippublicpublic
HeadquartersLimoges, FranceWesterville, United States
Primary listingLR.PAVRT
Market cap32.5B EUR74.8B USD
Parts placed822
Layers covered36
Units / subsidiaries10
Seen in machines12

Market caps are a nightly snapshot in each listing's own currency, never converted.

What the shared parts are

The 6 parts both make

PartLegrandVertiv
Enclosures
Layer 4 — Servers, racks & integration
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred
Rack PDUs
Layer 4 — Servers, racks & integration
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred
Rear-door heat exchangers
Layer 5 — Liquid cooling (IT-side: chip to CDU)
manufacturer disclosedmanufacturer inferred
Floor PDUs, RPPs, static transfer switches, ATS
Layer 7 — Electrical: power distribution (grid to rack)
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred
UPS (static, modular, rotary/DRUPS) & UPS power semis
Layer 7 — Electrical: power distribution (grid to rack)
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer disclosed
Metering, power quality, monitoring
Layer 7 — Electrical: power distribution (grid to rack)
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred

Only Legrand

Only Vertiv

Named in the same machines

Questions

Do Legrand and Vertiv compete?
In this catalog they are both placed on 6 of the same parts, across 3 layers: Enclosures, Rack PDUs, Rear-door heat exchangers, Floor PDUs, RPPs, static transfer switches, ATS and 2 more. Sharing a part does not mean selling the same product to the same buyer, so read each row's product note.
Which has more placements, Legrand or Vertiv?
Legrand has 8 placements and Vertiv has 22. Placement counts reflect how thoroughly each company has been catalogued as well as its real breadth, so they are not a ranking.

Generated from the catalog's part-to-company table. Each placement is tagged disclosed, reported or inferred; see sources & method. Neither company is endorsed or ranked here.