Who makes gpu baseboards & compute trays for AI data centers
GPU baseboards & compute trays (HGX, Bianca, UBB/OAM)
The baseboard is the printed circuit assembly that carries the GPUs (and often paired CPUs) and their direct power and interconnect, packaged into a tray that slides into the rack.
The compute tray sits between the packaged silicon (layer 1, layer 2 memory) and the rack-scale system (4.01): it's the board that physically carries the GPUs, any paired CPUs, VRMs (4.08), connectors (4.07) and the traces that bring scale-up fabric (3.01) to each chip. Nvidia's HGX and Bianca designs and the OAM/UBB open standard define the mechanical and electrical envelope; the ODMs build to that spec while Supermicro builds boards in-house rather than sourcing from the ODM tier. AI demand is the entire reason this part category exists in its current form — a baseboard carrying multiple high-power GPUs, coherent CPU links and dense high-speed interconnect is a different design problem from a general-purpose server motherboard, with far tighter power delivery, signal integrity and thermal requirements. For investors, the baseboard is where board complexity, layer count (4.05) and connector density all stack up, so it's a useful proxy for how much of a rack's bill of materials sits in high-spec board manufacturing versus commodity components; watch which board builders get first-wave qualification on each new GPU generation, since that tends to set the pecking order for the whole rack cycle.
AI delta: A compute tray carrying multiple high-power GPUs with coherent CPU links and dense scale-up interconnect is a fundamentally different design than a general-purpose server motherboard, which is why this category exists as its own part class.
Per rack: 18 compute trays per NVL72 (Nvidia rack specification, via taxonomy v0.1 Appendix A).
Companies on this part (8)
| Company | Role | Ownership | Ticker | Price | 1d | Confidence | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foxconn (Hon Hai) | manufacturer | public | 2317.TW | 253 TWD | +0.2% | inferred | boards built by |
| Inventec | manufacturer | public | 2356.TW | 65.00 TWD | -0.9% | inferred | |
| Nvidia | manufacturer | public | NVDA | 228 USD | +3.8% | inferred | and AMD designs |
| Pegatron | manufacturer | public | 4938.TW | 88.80 TWD | -0.7% | inferred | |
| Quanta Computer | manufacturer | public | 2382.TW | 332 TWD | -0.1% | inferred | |
| Supermicro | in house | public | SMCI | 38.46 USD | +0.3% | inferred | in-house |
| Wistron | manufacturer | public | 3231.TW | 180 TWD | -0.3% | inferred | |
| Wiwynn · unit of Wistron | manufacturer | public | 6669.TW | 7020 TWD | +3.5% | inferred |
Who competes here
The same table read the other way: every company above competes for gpu baseboards & compute trays sockets. Confidence tags matter — an inferred placement is a lead, not a confirmed rivalry.
Nearby parts
- Previous in layer: EMS, system integration & rack-level test
- Next in layer: Motherboards, CPU trays, switch trays
- Layer: Layer 4 — Servers, racks & integration
Sources: placements without a source URL come from the taxonomy seed and are tagged accordingly. How this data is built.· Markdown · JSON