Mitsubishi Electric vs Stulz

Mitsubishi Electric and Stulz are both placed on 3 of the same AI data center parts in this catalog, spanning layers 5, 6. Mitsubishi Electric appears on 12 parts in total and Stulz on 4.

At a glance

Mitsubishi ElectricStulz
Ownershippublicprivate
HeadquartersTokyo, Japannot on file
Primary listing6503.Tnone in catalog
Market cap9.76T JPY
Parts placed124
Layers covered52
Units / subsidiaries00
Seen in machines00

Market caps are a nightly snapshot in each listing's own currency, never converted.

What the shared parts are

The 3 parts both make

PartMitsubishi ElectricStulz
Coolant distribution units
Layer 5 — Liquid cooling (IT-side: chip to CDU)
manufacturer reportedmanufacturer inferred
Chillers & compressors
Layer 6 — Facility cooling & HVAC
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer disclosed
CRAH / CRAC / fan walls / in-row units
Layer 6 — Facility cooling & HVAC
manufacturer inferredmanufacturer inferred

Only Mitsubishi Electric

Only Stulz

Questions

Do Mitsubishi Electric and Stulz compete?
In this catalog they are both placed on 3 of the same parts, across 2 layers: Coolant distribution units, Chillers & compressors, CRAH / CRAC / fan walls / in-row units. Sharing a part does not mean selling the same product to the same buyer, so read each row's product note.
Which has more placements, Mitsubishi Electric or Stulz?
Mitsubishi Electric has 12 placements and Stulz has 4. Placement counts reflect how thoroughly each company has been catalogued as well as its real breadth, so they are not a ranking.

Generated from the catalog's part-to-company table. Each placement is tagged disclosed, reported or inferred; see sources & method. Neither company is endorsed or ranked here.