AI Data Center PartsSearch
Home / Parts / Servers, racks & integration / Board-level connectors & sockets
4.07

Who makes board-level connectors & sockets for AI data centers

The physical connectors — CPU and GPU sockets, board-to-board and cable connectors, and I/O cages — that link chips, trays and cables together on and between boards.

Connectors sit at nearly every junction in the rack: CPU and GPU sockets attach silicon to the baseboard (4.03), board-to-board connectors link trays together, and I/O cages (4.07a) terminate the optical and copper interconnect coming off layer 3. As pin counts, power currents and signal speeds all rise with each GPU generation, socket and connector design becomes a harder mechanical and electrical problem — more contact points, tighter tolerances on insertion force and contact resistance, and more attention to high-speed signal integrity through the connector itself. AI racks also simply need more connectors per system than a conventional server, both because there are more trays to link and because power delivery at rack scale increasingly moves through busbars and whips (4.15) rather than cables, each with its own connector interface. For investors, this tier tends to be sticky once a connector is designed into a socket or board generation, since requalifying a different supplier's socket against a new GPU package is not a drop-in swap; the interesting question by generation is who wins the socket design-in for the next GPU package.

AI delta: Higher pin counts, higher currents and faster signaling with each GPU generation make socket and connector design a harder mechanical problem, and AI racks need more connectors per system than a conventional server simply because there are more trays to link.

Appears at:Enterprise / small coloLarge colo / hyperscale buildingAI campusGW-class campus· cooling:any — connector count per rack rises with tray count and interconnect density rather than with facility size, so it scales with rack generation more than with deployment tier.

Companies on this part (12)

CompanyRoleOwnershipTickerPrice1dConfidenceNote
Acesmanufacturerpublic3605.TW126 TWD+6.3%inferred
AmphenolmanufacturerpublicAPH161 USD-1.3%inferred
Bizlinkmanufacturerpublic3665.TW2190 TWD+6.3%inferred
Foxconn Interconnectmanufacturerpublic6088.HK5.55 HKD+5.1%inferred
Hirosemanufacturerpublic6806.T26485 JPY+2.7%inferred
JAEmanufacturerpublic6807.T2500 JPY+1.5%inferred
Lotesmanufacturerpublic3533.TW1650 TWD+1.9%inferredCPU/GPU sockets
Luxsharemanufacturerpublic002475.SZ58.24 CNY+1.9%inferred
TE ConnectivitymanufacturerpublicTEL203 USD-1.0%inferred
Yamaichimanufacturerpublic6941.T8110 JPY-0.5%inferred
Molexmanufacturerprivateinferred
Samtecmanufacturerprivateinferred

OSFP/QSFP cages 4.07a

CompanyRoleOwnershipTickerPrice1dConfidenceNote
AmphenolmanufacturerpublicAPH161 USD-1.3%inferred
TE ConnectivitymanufacturerpublicTEL203 USD-1.0%inferred
Molexmanufacturerprivateinferred

Who competes here

The same table read the other way: every company above competes for board-level connectors & sockets sockets. Confidence tags matter — an inferred placement is a lead, not a confirmed rivalry.

Nearby parts

Latest feed

Sources: placements without a source URL come from the taxonomy seed and are tagged accordingly. How this data is builtMarkdown · JSON