What Efacec makes for data centers
subsidiary · unit of Mutares
Efacec is a unit of Mutares. It appears on 1 part of the AI data center — Large power transformers (345–765 kV) & substations — in the role of manufacturer. That part sits in Layer 7 — Electrical: power distribution (grid to rack). Large power transformers (345–765 kV) & substations is flagged as a supply constraint in this catalog.
Parts, by layer
Layer 7 — Electrical: power distribution (grid to rack)
| Part | Role | Confidence | Competitors | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large power transformers (345–765 kV) & substationsconstrained | manufacturer | inferred | CG Power, GE Vernova, Hyosung Heavy, Hyundai Electric, Končar, LS Electric |
Where Efacec sits in the stack
Efacec's placements in this catalog cover 1 part, all in layer 7, electrical: power distribution (grid to rack). One of them is tagged constrained, meaning a sourced shortage rather than a long lead time. Across these parts it overlaps with other companies most often on the lines below.
What these parts are
- Large power transformers (345–765 kV) & substationsconstrained — Grid-scale transformers and switchyards that step transmission voltage down to what a data center campus can use, plus the substation civil works around them.
Closest peers in this catalog
Questions about Efacec
- What does Efacec make for AI data centers?
- This catalog places Efacec on 1 part: Large power transformers (345–765 kV) & substations (manufacturer).
- Is Efacec publicly traded?
- Not on its own — this catalog records Efacec as a unit of Mutares, so the traded entity is the parent.
- Who else makes large power transformers (345–765 kV) & substations for AI data centers?
- CG Power, GE Vernova, Hyosung Heavy, Hyundai Electric, Končar and LS Electric are also placed on Large power transformers (345–765 kV) & substations in this catalog.
- How well sourced are these placements?
- Every part→company placement carries a confidence tag. For Efacec the mix is 1 inferred. "disclosed" means the company or a filing says so; "reported" comes from trade press or a reference-design list; "inferred" is a lead from the taxonomy with no citation yet. Treat reported and inferred as leads, not facts.
Answers are generated from this catalog's own rows — see sources & method.