What Sargent & Lundy makes for data centers

private · HQ United States

Sargent & Lundy is a private company and based in United States. It appears on 2 parts of the AI data center — Architecture, engineering & MEP design and Transmission EPC — in the roles of designer and contractor. Those parts sit in Layer 8 — Power generation & energy supply and Layer 9 — Building shell, site & construction.

Exposure
2 parts across 2 layers
No disclosed data-center revenue share on file.

Parts, by layer

Layer 8 — Power generation & energy supply

PartRoleConfidenceCompetitorsNote
Transmission EPCcontractorinferredDycom, MYR, MasTec, Primoris, Quanta Services, Black & Veatch

Layer 9 — Building shell, site & construction

PartRoleConfidenceCompetitorsNote
Architecture, engineering & MEP designdesignerinferredAECOM, AtkinsRéalis, Fluor, Jacobs, Stantec, Sweco

Where Sargent & Lundy sits in the stack

Sargent & Lundy's placements in this catalog cover 2 parts, from layer 8 (power generation & energy supply) to layer 9 (building shell, site & construction). None of them currently carries a sourced supply constraint tag. Across these parts it overlaps with other companies most often on the lines below.

What these parts are

Closest peers in this catalog

Questions about Sargent & Lundy

What does Sargent & Lundy make for AI data centers?
This catalog places Sargent & Lundy on 2 parts: Architecture, engineering & MEP design (designer) and Transmission EPC (contractor).
Is Sargent & Lundy publicly traded?
No listing is on file for Sargent & Lundy in this catalog; it is recorded as private.
Where is Sargent & Lundy based?
United States, per the company record in this catalog.
Who else makes architecture, engineering & MEP design for AI data centers?
AECOM, AtkinsRéalis, Fluor, Jacobs, Stantec and Sweco are also placed on Architecture, engineering & MEP design in this catalog.
How well sourced are these placements?
Every part→company placement carries a confidence tag. For Sargent & Lundy the mix is 2 inferred. "disclosed" means the company or a filing says so; "reported" comes from trade press or a reference-design list; "inferred" is a lead from the taxonomy with no citation yet. Treat reported and inferred as leads, not facts.

Answers are generated from this catalog's own rows — see sources & method.

Verification: seeded.· Markdown · JSON